The Labour Party (LP) and its presidential candidate, Peter Obi, on Friday, June 23, closed their petition challenging the election of President Bola Tinubu before the Presidential Election Petition Court (PEPC) sitting in Abuja.

Obi and LP are complainants in the petition marked CA/PEPC/03/2023, challenging the election which brought Tinubu to power on May 29.

Respondents in the petition are the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Tinubu, Vice President Kashim Shettima, and the All Progressives Congress (APC).

The petitioners (LP and Obi) were given 21 days to prove their case against the respondents before the court.

They told the court that they would call 50 witnesses to prove their case, but as they were closing on Friday, they called only 13 witnesses.

Earlier, the counsel for the petitioners, Livy Uzoukwu, SAN, informed the court that their 12th witness, Yunusa Tanko, was in court to be cross-examined by the respondents.

READ ALSO: Obi, LP to tribunal: INEC refused to provide documents we requested

The counsels for the respondents are Kemi Pinhero, SAN, for INEC; Wole Olanipakun, SAN, for Tinubu and Shettima; while Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, represented APC.

The 12th witness was Yunusa Tanko, a member of LP Situation Room, who testified, and some documents were tendered through him.

Being cross-examined by INEC, the witness told the court that the results given to them were mutilated and not readable.

When asked by Olanipekun how many party agents his party had during the election, he said over 130,000, while there were 176,974 polling units through the federation.

Tanko was also asked what he wanted the court to do with the 12 states where LP won and what would happen to the presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Atiku Abubakar, who was declared second in the election.

He said he was challenging the entire results of the election because after four months of the election, the results are still being downloaded from the IreV.

When asked by Fagbemi on why he did not provide the number of unlawful votes, he claimed that their expert had already given evidence on the number of disputed votes.

The respondents tendered through the witness judgements of the Federal High Court, with FHC/ABJ/1454/2022, delivered on January 23, 2023, concerning LP and INEC.

Tendered also was a SC/CV/501/2023, Supreme Court judgement delivered on May 26, 2023, between PDP and INEC with three others.

The petitioners objected to the admissibility of the documents and reserved their reason in their final written addresses.

The court however admitted and marked the documents as exhibits.

The 13th witness, Peter Yari, an adhoc staff of INEC, also gave his evidence.

The counsel for the petitioners, Uzoukwu, after the testimony of the 13th witness, informed the court that they are closing their case.

The respondents prayed the court to give them till next week to go home and celebrate the Sallah with their families and come back by July 3 to open their case.

The five-member panel presided over by Justice Haruna Tsammani adjourned until July 3, 2023, for the respondents to open their case.

The Star