Court orders KWASU to pay dismissed lecturer 3 months salary

The National Industrial Court has ordered Kwara State University (KWASU) to pay a dismissed lecturer, Dr David Atanda, his three months salary in lieu of notice of the termination of his appointment.

The court also ordered KWASU to calculate, pay the three months salary within 21 days, and awarded the sum of N200,000 as cost in favour of the claimant.

The presiding judge, Justice Kiyersohot Damulak, while delivering judgement on Friday, however, dismissed the allegation of wrongful employment termination filed by the claimant (lecturer) against the defendant for lacking merit.

The claimant (lecturer) told the court that his appointment with the university was for a three-year probationary period.

He further averred that he faced a disciplinary committee on alleged misconduct after which his appointment was terminated on October 10, 2016.

Atanda also stated that the defendant acted ultra vires, as he was not accorded fair hearing and was not given the opportunity to see or hear from the people that allegedly made reports or complaints against him.

He equally said he was not given the opportunity to question or cross-examine the people that levelled the allegations against him.

READ ALSO: KWASU promotes 20 to professorial cadre

The claimant added that by his letter of appointment, he ought to have been given either three months notice of the termination or payment in lieu of the notice.

Atanda argued that the senior staff disciplinary committee and KWASU lacked the power to investigate the allegation levelled against him.

In defence, the defendant maintained that the claimant was afforded an opportunity to be heard and also cross-examined those that gave evidence against him, adding that it followed the laid down procedure as provided by the University Law.

The defendant also averred that by section 16 of the Kwara State Law, 2008, (Kwara State University Law, 2008), the university can investigate and punish any of its erring staff.

KWASU further argued that the claimant was not entitled to any payment in lieu of notice, urging the court to dismiss the case in its entirety.

The court, after evaluating the submissions of both parties and careful evaluation of the submission of both parties, held that the claimant’s allegation of want of fair hearing was not proven and not sustainable.

On the reinstatement claim, the court ruled that the termination of Atanda’s appointment was during the period of his probation and was therefore not entitled to such order.

The court also ordered KWASU to calculate and pay Atanda three months’ salary in lieu of notice within 21 days.

The Star