DSS sues Sowore, X, Meta over ‘criminal’ post against Tinubu

The Department of State Services (DSS) has filed criminal charges against human rights activist Omoyele Sowore at the Federal High Court in Abuja.

The DSS filed the charges on Tuesday, September 16, 2025.

Also named in the suit as the 2nd and 3rd defendants were X Corp (owners of the social media platform X) and Meta Platforms Inc., the parent company of Facebook.

The DSS, acting through the Federal Ministry of Justice (FMOJ), filed a five-count charge against Sowore, accusing him of defaming President Bola Tinubu by labelling him a “criminal” in social media posts.

The secret police noted that the alleged statements were made via Sowore’s X account and Facebook page on August 25 and 26, 2025, during the president’s official visit to Brazil.

The charge sheet was filed by M.B. Abubakar, Esq., Director of Public Prosecutions at the FMOJ, together with M.E. Ernest, Esq., U.B. Bulla, Esq., C.S. Eze, and E.G. Orubor, Esq. as listed counsel.

DSS gives Sowore one week to retract ‘criminal’ post against Tinubu

The DSS listed the exhibits in support of its case to include a printout of Sowore’s tweet on X, a printout of his Facebook post, and a letter addressed to X.

Other exhibits were a letter addressed to Meta Platforms Inc. and Sowore’s subsequent posts responding to those letters.

As of Tuesday, the matter has not yet been assigned to any judge, and no date has been fixed for Sowore’s arraignment.

Reacting to the latest development, Sowore declared his readiness to face the DSS in court.

“It’s hard to believe there’s anyone sensible left in these offices that should be making Nigeria work. Regardless, I will be present whenever this case is assigned for trial,” he wrote on X.

The DSS had earlier demanded that Sowore, former presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC), retract the posts, publish a public apology across national media, and issue a statement of retraction on X.

Sowore, however, refused, insisting that his remarks were protected under freedom of expression.

The DSS, thereafter, threatened to pursue the matter “within the ambit of the law,” leading to the current criminal charges.

The Star