Crimes

N8.5bn Fraud: Army General must face trial, court rules

A former Commander of the Joint Military Task Force, Operation Pulo Shield, Major-General Emmanuel Atewe (rtd.), and a staffer of the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA), Kime Engonzu, have been told that they have a case to answer in the alleged N8.5 billion money laundering case.

The case was brought against them before Justice Ayokunle Faji of the Federal High Court sitting in Ikoyi, Lagos by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

Atewe and Engonzu are standing trial on a 22-count charge bordering on money laundering to the tune of N8,537,586,798.58, which also involves a former Director-General of NIMASA, Patrick Akpobolokemi, and Josephine Otuaga, also a staffer of NIMASA.

One of the counts reads: “That you, Patrick Ziadeke Akpobolokemi, Major General Emmanuel Atewe, Kime Engozu, and Josphine Otuaga, sometime in 2014, in Lagos, within the jurisdiction of this court, with intent to defraud, conspired amongst yourselves to commit an offence to wit: conversion of the sum of N8,537,586,798.58 property of the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 18 (a) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act 2012 and punishable under Section 15 (3) of the same Act.”

Naira abuse: Bobrisky appeals sentence, seeks fine option

They pleaded “not guilty” to the charges, thereby prompting the commencement of their trial.
In the course of the trial, the prosecution called several witnesses and subsequently closed its case against the defendants.
However, the defendants, rather than open their defence, filed a no-case-submission.

Akpobolokemi had, in a no-case submission, filed by his lawyer, Dr. Joseph Nwobike (SAN), prayed the court for an acquittal without having him present a defence.

Ruling on the no-case submission on Monday, April 22, 2024, Justice Faji discharged and acquitted Akpobolokemi and Otuaga, the fourth defendant.

He, however, ruled that Atewe, the second defendant, and Engonzu, the third defendant, should open their defence in counts 12 to 22 of the charge.

The Star

Editor

Recent Posts

AI will change work: Skills alignment’ll determine who remains relevant, By TOSIN OROGUN

By TOSIN OROGUN Why the future belongs not to those who adopt AI first, but…

2 hours ago

How Tinubu is redrawing South-East political map, By TUNDE RAHMAN

By TUNDE RAHMAN When the 2023 presidential election results were announced, many analysts and commentators…

2 hours ago

FG denies planned electricity tariff hike, reaffirms subsidy for vulnerable consumers

The Federal Government has dismissed reports suggesting it plans to increase electricity tariffs for consumers,…

3 hours ago

High interest rates push drugmakers’ finance costs up 47%

Nigeria's listed pharmaceutical companies recorded a sharp increase in borrowing costs in the first quarter…

3 hours ago

Church’s General Overseer commits suicide in Akwa Ibom

The Founder and General Overseer of Power in the Word of God for the World…

4 hours ago

Anthony Joshua overcomes early knockdowns to stop Prenga, sets up Fury showdown

Anthony Joshua overcame two early knockdowns to stop Kristian Prenga in the second round on…

4 hours ago

This website uses cookies.