Top Stories

Senate rejects Buhari’s new Electoral Act Amendment Bill

The Senate on Wednesday rejected President Muhammdu Buhari’s Bill seeking to amend the recently passed Electoral Act, 2022.

The Bill titled: “A Bill for an Act to amend the Electoral Act 2022 and for related matters, 2022,” was rejected overwhelmingly by senators at second reading.

The bill had successfully passed the first reading.

But it was thrown out on Wednesday.

Senators spoke against the bill.

In the new bill, Buhari is seeking amendment of Section 84 (12) of the Electoral Amendment Act 2022.

The President had while signing the 2022 Electoral Amendment Bill on February 25, complained that the provision constituted fundamental defect, saying it was in conflict with extant constitutional provisions.

According to him, section 84 (12) constitutes a disenfranchisement of serving political office holders from voting or being voted for at conventions or congresses of any political party.

This, he said, was for the purpose of the nomination of candidates for any election in cases where it holds earlier than 30 days to the national election.

The section reads: “No political appointee at any level shall be voting delegate or be voted for at the convention or congress of any political party for the purpose of the nomination of candidates for any election.”

He stated that the provision introduced qualification and disqualification criteria that ultra vires the Constitution by way of importing blanket restriction and disqualification.

This he said was basically for serving political office holders of which they were constitutionally accorded protection.

READ ALSO: At last, Buhari signs Electoral Act Amendment Bill into law

The Federal High Court had on Tuesday March 7, stopped Buhari, Attorney General of the Federation and the National Assembly from tampering with the newly amended Electoral Act 2022.

Justice Inyang Ekwo, in a ruling on an ex parte application by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) agreed that the electoral act had become a valid law and could not be tampered with without following due process.

Ekwo held that the proper place to challenge validity of any existing law was in a court of competent jurisdiction.

Details later…

The Star

Editor

Recent Posts

Kano tailor wraps up five-day sewing marathon for Guinness record

A Kano-based tailor, Abdulkadir Hassanul Basari, has completed a 120-hour sewing marathon in a bid…

8 minutes ago

FG offers N1.75trn bonds for subscription

The Federal Government has offered bonds worth N1.75 trillion for subscription at an auction scheduled…

2 hours ago

Shell to sell Nigerian gas distribution business to Vaaris Energy

Shell has agreed to sell its entire interest in its Nigerian domestic gas distribution business…

2 hours ago

Zenith Bank loses N376m to fraud in six months

Zenith Bank Plc lost N376m to fraud and forgeries in the first half of 2026,…

2 hours ago

UBA mourns victims of NAF 931 aircraft crash

United Bank for Africa (UBA) Plc has extended its condolences to the Nigerian Air Force…

3 hours ago

Oyo’s diphtheria outbreak sparks questions over N9.8bn World Bank-backed project

The All Progressives Congress (APC) campaign organisation in Oyo State has questioned the use of…

3 hours ago

This website uses cookies.